Save Twitter Search results forever with Tweetdoc
By Martin Bryant on September 7, 2009
Twitter Search is a powerful way of measuring public opinion but it’s currently crippled because you can’t look very far back. At present you can view tweets no older than ten days. Wouldn’t it be good if you could easily save search results to come back to at a later date?
Tweetdoc aims to solve that problem in a beautifully simple way – saving Twitter Search results as a PDF.
Who is this useful for? Imagine you run an event that uses a hashtag – you could keep a permanent record of the what people were saying on Twitter about the event by saving all mentions of your hashtag with Tweetdoc. Businesses could run a daily Twitter search for their brand name using Tweetdoc and use it in marketing reports.
Tweetdoc’s PDFs are well presented, with a title page displaying a user-related description of the search along with the avatars of every Twitter user included in the search. Although the default setting makes your PDF publicly available on the Tweetdoc site, you can set up a user account and set your documents to be private – something I imagine most users will want to do.
The main problem is that PDF generation is currently slow. I mean really slow. You could be waiting the best part of half an hour to receive your finished document. Even when the report is complete, the ‘Processing’ notification continues to display. Refresh the page, though, and you’ll find your finished report.
For a service still in the early stages of its development this can be excused, but it needs improving as many people will just assume the service is broken. In today’s realtime web your rarely have to wait for anything. Maybe a progress bar would help here.
Although originally designed for event organisers, Tweetdoc is beginning to take steps to address the needs of business users. The service’s developer Martin Rue has just added one-click integration with Edocr, a Youtube-style service that allows easy hosting and sharing of documents. This is the first use of Edocr’s new OAuth-based API.
Ideas for the future include charging for premium features like automated daily reports. If Tweetdoc continues to hone its service we could be looking at a highly useful tool here.
- http://ri.ms/nc79" title="Tweet This!" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Tweet This!
- Digg this!
- Share this on del.icio.us
- Share this on Facebook
- Post this to MySpace
- Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon
- Share this on Reddit
- Add this to Google Bookmarks
- Buzz up!
Martin Bryant Co-founder, Social Media Café Manchester
Martin Bryant is based in Manchester, UK. A co-founder of the city's monthly Social Media Cafe events and award-winning blogger, he trains young people in broadcast and social media skills and produces digital media in the education sector. His main interests are developments in the social web that relate to the mobile and music industries. Twitter, Blog, FriendFeed
Senin, 07 September 2009
Save Twitter Search results forever with Tweetdoc
Penn Olson – Study: 80% of People Use Twitter for Business
According to a new research from Kamaron Research Institute, about 80% of the people use Twitter for business purposes. More than 8 in 10 listed “business” as the reason why they tweet.
This holds true for younger twitter-ers as well. Nearly half of those aged 25 and under gave “business” as the primary reason they tweet.
This Study, “Why Do You Tweet” was conducted online with a respondent group size of 280 Twitter Users.
It is common to see businesses on Twitter. Now that we have statistics to back our intuition, it reaffirms Twitter’s value in the business world.
This Study Came At The Right Time
Just 3 days ago, Biz Stone told Venturebeat that strategic statistic tools for businesses would soon be officially introduced on Twitter. Assuming the findings to be representative of the whole Twitter community, Biz Stone and co can very well expect a great sign up rate upon launch.
It seems like Twitter is doing all the right things to appeal to its users, helping it grow on the right track towards monetization; Stats for Business, Geolocation Tagging, Project Retweet, New Homepage.
Social Media Evolving to a Full Pledge Marketing Media
Social media has rocked the world and it is not hard to understand why. Not having a Facebook account would make you seem like an alien in college or workplace. It is becoming a standard way of life across the globe. With the amount of traffic these sites are generating, social media has certainly caught many businesses’ attention.
Slowly but surely, most social sites would evolve into a media for marketers. This is probably one of the reasons why teens don’t tweet and why Facebook experienced a growth in its age 55+ segment.
Let’s hope all businesses can be as cool and fun as @Mailchimp, @DellOutlet and @Starbucks.
Twitter will be business tool no 1 in the virtual world?
Minggu, 06 September 2009
5 Useful Websites For Photographers
5 Useful Websites For Photographers
Sep. 3rd, 2009 By Dean Sherwin
Photography is a hobby that millions of people partake in every day. For many people, including me, it started out when they were a kid snapping pretend photos with their dad’s empty camera.
Now, with digital SLRs readily available and even the world’s first ever 3D camera now on the scene, the hobby (and indeed profession for many) keeps growing and growing in an era where still images and print was predicted to be obsolete.
The web is the greatest place for photographers to share photos and socialise, with Flickr undoubtedly being the biggest site for photographers to show off their snaps. But how about when it comes to editing their snaps or indeed just getting solid advice?
I have whittled down a list of many photography websites that I found into the five best sites for the amateur and semi-pro photographer.
Photoshop Express
This is a web app owned and run by the well-known Photoshop company – Adobe. It is a watered down version of their software and it allows the user to make basic editing to their photographs online before sharing them.
It’s really easy to use. Down the left hand side of the editing screen you have your basic tools such as ‘Auto-Correct’, ‘Crop’, ‘Touch up’, and ‘Remove Redeye’. These can all be used by clicking and dragging the mouse, which your average PC user, who has used MS Paint once or twice, should have no trouble with.
The list continues with some more advanced tools such as ‘Colour Saturation’, ‘Highlighting’, ‘Tint’ and ‘Focus’. All of these can transform a good shot into something memorable where the eye washes over the picture numerous times taking in all the attention to detail.
Across the top there are some upload tools and a link to your gallery. Photoshop Express lets you have up to 2GB of online storage – more than enough to upload a days worth of photographs waiting to be given a tweak here and there.
You also get you own gallery page under the Photoshop domain, for example, Mygallerypage.photoshop.com.
For more on Photoshop Express visit the MakeUseOf Directory.
PicResize
Pic Resize is a photography website that does pretty much what it says on the domain; it resizes pictures. This is an easy to use tool with some extra features thrown in.
When you get to the home page simply select the file you want by clicking ‘Browse’ and upload it. This will bring you to section two as seen in the screenshot. Here you can crop your picture, select what size you want to make it and add special affects such as ‘Sharpen’, ‘Greyscale’, ‘Rotate’ and ‘Blur’. You can do one or all of these options. Then click ‘Resize’ at the end of the page.
The final page gives you four options to choose from. You can preview the image, save it, publish it to the web or use the ‘Advanced Edit’ tool.
The advanced edit tool doesn’t give much more options but it is good for just giving it that final touch-up after the resize. You can crop, add text, blur, explode, and add a frame along with a few other small options.
Golden Hour
Golden Hour is a web app that tells you the best times to go out on the hunt for a mean shot in a certain area. Any photographer will tell you that they always go snapping at the ‘Golden Hour’ (or ‘Magic Hour’ as it’s sometimes known) because the sun is at the right angle of elevation relevant to the particular landmass selected.
All you have to do is click on where it is on the map that you plan on shooting and the app will tell you what times are the best to go. The hour is highlighted on a chart below the map and when you roll over it gives you some information as to why this is the golden hour for this location. The app will also tell you when there is a full moon coming up for those who want some good night time pictures.
Watermark
So after spending the day snapping like crazy, the photographer comes up against a new problem – copyright. As a freelance writer, I discovered my work stolen by two websites on two separate occasions when playing with CopyScape. The feeling of anger and to be honest, helplessness is awful.
What can you do? It’s the internet and tracking down someone is like looking for a needle in a haystack. However, with photographs the creators can protect them by adding in a watermark that will stop people from stealing their work.
A great (and free) online tool I found that can do this is a photography website called Watermark. This has a good free account option with the ability to upgrade to the premium account if you so wish. The free account does all you would really need. You can mark multiple photos at once and you can customise the watermark with different text, colours, size and effects as seen in the screenshot.
The only bad parts to the free account that you would notice is that a picture cannot be any larger than 0.5Mb which shouldn’t obstruct you much if you’re only posting them online. Also, it doesn’t save your watermark for when you come back later.
Both Karl and Jim have discussed watermarking alternatives here and here.
Fotopedia
Finally when the photograph has been taken, edited, resized and protected there comes the time to publish it. Sure, one could indeed use Flickr or perhaps a personal blog but for me, Fotopedia stands out from the rest.
With Fotopedia, photographs are organised and even voted upon by users as one of the main features to determine which ones should represent each category. Many of the photographs actually come from other web services such as Flickr as seen under them in the photographer’s credit area. You’re assured that you’re getting the best of the best however, as irrelevant or low quality photos are removed from the categories via the user vote system.
Fellow MakeUseOf writer Jim Henderson has done lots of photography-related articles here on MakeUseOf. To see what he has done so far, check out his MakeUseOf writers page.
So what web tools and services do MakeUseOf readers use for their photographs?
More about: image editing, image resizer, photo effects, photography, photos, watermark View all tags
Is Online Education More Effective Than Traditional Learning?
Is Online Education More Effective Than Traditional Learning?
Written by Guest Author / September 6, 2009 11:00 AM / 4 Comments
One of the fastest growing uses of technology is for online education. Student enrollment in online university degree programs has increased in recent years, but more interesting is the increase in kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12) students who are foregoing recess and pep rallies to study in virtual classrooms.
K12 is the largest provider of accredited online learning for grades K-12. It offers tuition-free and private supplemental learning, blended online/offline programs, and full-time online programs in the United States and internationally. K12 allows students to learn at their own level and has a strong social community with regularly sponsored events.
Great as all this sounds, the trend towards online learning raises the question of just how effective online education is compared to traditional education. According to a recent study conducted by SRI International for the US Department of Education, online learners perform slightly better than students in traditional face-to-face classrooms. The study analyzed research that compared online and conventional learning at institutions of higher education and in K-12 settings between 1996 and 2008.
A key finding of the report is that students doing partial or all course work online rank, on average, in the 59th percentile, meaning better than 59% of all those who were scored; whereas students in traditional classrooms ranked in the 50th percentile. Though this significant difference doesn't quite mean the end of institutional schools, it will help put an end to the myth that online learning is inferior to traditional learning. It will also help foster greater interest in developing technology geared specifically to education. No doubt, we will see online schools for K-12 pop up everywhere.
Already a giant in online university degrees, Kaplan has begun offering programs for students in grades 6 to 12, tailored to each learner. The company also runs the Kaplan Academy, a tuition-free online public high school available in six states. Kaplan has over 70 years of experience in distance learning and will likely see its numbers soar as more students (supported by their parents) opt for non-traditional schooling, in the hope of improving their chances of being admitted to their college of choice.
With social networks, slidesharing, IM, video and more at their disposal, students are finding it easier to get homework help, attend seminars, and even learn new languages. And educators can connect at a global level to discuss lesson plans and offer seminars.
Although Twitter may not penetrate the classroom just yet, social media help students maintain an active social life beyond the classroom. One of the biggest myths about online education is that students will become socially inept. Instead, learning online allows students to study at their own pace, usually opening up hours for sports, hobbies, volunteer work, and time with friends. Most programs also allow students to study what interests them. Not that learning online is easier. In fact, quite the opposite: students require tremendous discipline and excellent time management skills, two qualities that Insight Schools uses to promote its program. Insight Schools operates a network of tuition-free, accredited, online public high schools. Students receive their own laptop, as well as personalized education tailored to their lifestyle.
One would imagine that high school and college students are more likely to take advantage of online programs, but homeschooling has existed as long as education has, so it's a viable option for those in younger grades as well. Some children have special needs and talents, others have disabilities or simply struggle in the class. Parents looking for an alternative to traditional schooling for their child now have options other than special classes, tutoring and expensive private schools. Online education offers students more one-on-one time with their instructors. And, as a bonus, most K-12 online programs are inexpensive or even tuition-free
Google Book Search Bibliography
Introduction
This bibliography presents selected English-language articles and other works that are useful in understanding Google Book Search. It primarily focuses on the evolution of Google Book Search and the legal, library, and social issues associated with it. Where possible, links are provided to works that are freely available on the Internet, including e-prints in disciplinary archives and institutional repositories. Note that e-prints and published articles may not be identical.
See the Google Book Search Library Partners page for a list of library participants.
An archive of prior versions of the bibliography is available.
Bibliography
Albanese, Andrew. "AAP Sues Google over Scan Plan." Library Journal, 15 November 2005. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6282641.html
———. "AAUP: Google Needs to Move More." Publishers Weekly, 23 August 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6250473.html
———. "AAUP Pressures Google Print: Can Digitizing Library Material Represent Infringement?" Library Journal, 15 July 2005. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA622706.html
———. "ALA/ARL Issues Guide to Google Settlement." Library Journal, 19 November 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6615546.html
———. "Darnton Essay Sparks Google Discussion, but Misunderstandings Persist." Library Journal, 3 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6634361.html
———. "Deal or No Deal: What if the Google Settlement Fails?" Publishers Weekly, 25 May 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6660295.html
———. "Delay Looming for Google Settlement Deadline?" Publishers Weekly, 27 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654551.html
———. "European Booksellers Slam Google Book Settlement." Library Journal, 2 December 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6619104.html
———. "Europeans Seem to Know Little about Google Settlement, but Enough Not to Like It." Publishers Weekly, 22 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6653182.html
———. "Extension, Possible Review Challenge Google Settlement." Publishers Weekly, 4 May 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6655853.html
———. "Google Book Deal Gets 'Preliminary' Court Approval; More Boosters Emerge." Library Journal, 21 November 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6616456.html
———. "Google Deadline Delayed Four Months as Steinbeck Motion Granted." Publishers Weekly, 28 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654845.html
———. "Google Pauses Scan Plan." Library Journal, 1 September 2005. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6251475.html
———. "Google Scanning Deal Details Provoke New Controversy." Publishers Weekly, 15 June 2007. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6452409.html
———. "Google Scans, Contract Released: Search Firm Also Will Link to Archives, Allow Downloads." Library Journal, 1 October 2005, 14-15. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6373321.html
———. "Google Settles Landmark Lawsuit over Book Scanning." Library Journal, 28 October 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6609195.html
———. "Is Google Deal a Setback for Rival Digitization Efforts?" Library Journal, 25 November 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6617695.html
———. "Judge Rejects Internet Archive Motion to Intervene in Google Settlement." Publishers Weekly, 24 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654190.html
———. "Libraries Reserve Early Comment, but Some See Bright Side in Google Book Search Settlement." Library Journal, 28 October 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6609159.html
———. "Library Leaders Meet to Discuss Google Book Search Deal." Library Journal, 17 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6638100.html
———. "Library Organizations to File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search Settlement." Library Journal, 26 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6640461.html
———. "New York Law School to Launch Google Book Search Web Site." Publishers Weekly, 6 May 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6656797.html
———. "One for All? As Google Deal Is Evaluated, Critics Question Single Library Terminal." Library Journal, 11 November 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6613723.html
———. "Publisher: No Thanks, Google." Library Journal, 1 November 2005, 18. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6277398.htm
———. "Resistance Grows as Google Deadline Nears." Publishers Weekly, 20 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6652472.html
———. "Talking about Google Settlement, Publisher Cites Monopoly, Duopoly, and New Library Sales." Library Journal, 27 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6640464.html
Albanese, Andrew, and Norman Oder. "In Wide-Ranging Interview, Google Talks Books." Library Journal, 13 March 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6643470.html
Albanese, Andrew, and Calvin Reid. "Google Settlement Supporters Ready to State Case." Publishers Weekly, 8 June 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6663287.html
Baksik, Corinna. "Fair Use or Exploitation? The Google Book Search Controversy." portal: Libraries & the Academy 6, no. 4 (2006): 399-415.
Band, Jonathan. "The Google Library Project: Both Sides of the Story." Information Outlook 10, no. 6 (2006): 35-54. http://www.plagiary.org/Google-Library-Project.pdf
———. "The Google Print Library Project: A Copyright Analysis." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 242 (2005): 6-9. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlbr242google.pdf
———. A Guide for the Perplexed: Libraries & the Google Library Project Settlement. Washington, DC: American Library Association and the Association of Research Libraries, 2008. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/google-settlement-13nov08.pdf
———. A Guide for the Perplexed Part II: The Amended Google-Michigan Agreement. Washington, DC: American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries, and Association of Research Libraries, 2009. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/google-michigan-12jun09.pdf
Banks, Marcus A. "The Excitement of Google Scholar, the Worry of Google Print." Biomedical Digital Libraries 2 (Article 2 2005). http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1079792
Banks, Michael A. "An Author Looks at Google Book Search." Online 30, no. 2 (2006): 15-17.
Bearman, David. "Jean-Noöl Jeanneney's Critique of Google: Private Sector Book Digitization and Digital Library Policy." D-Lib Magazine 12, no. 12 (2006). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december06/bearman/12bearman.html
Bender, Mark R. "Google's Book Search: An Australian Copyright Perspective." SSRN, 2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=981664
Bisk, J. S. B. "Book Search Is Beautiful?: An Analysis of Whether Google Book Search Violates International Copyright Law." Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 17, no. 1 (2007): 271-310.
Bjørner, Susanne. "Google Library Project Expands to Spain." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 9 October 2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=18352
Caldwell, Tracey. "Google Settles Legal Woes with Creation of $125M Book Rights Registry." Information World Review, 3 December 2008. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/features/2231863/tight-embrace
Carlson, Scott. "Publishers Sue Google to Prevent Scanning of Copyrighted Works." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 October 2005, A43.
———. "U. of California Is in Talks to Join Google's Library-Scanning Project." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 August 2006, A29.
———. "U. of California Will Provide Up to 3,000 Books a Day for Google to Scan." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 September 2006, A32.
Carlson, Scott, and Jeffrey R. Young. "Google Will Digitize and Search Millions of Books from 5 Top Research Libraries." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 June 2005, A37-A40.
Carnevale, Dan. "Google Strikes a Deal With 12 Universities to Digitize 10 Million Books." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 15 June 2007, A35.
———. "U. of Michigan Unveils Its Book-Scanning Contract With Google." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 June 2005.
Chillingworth, Mark. "Magazine Search Unlikely Say Google." Information World Review, 17 October 2007. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2201300/magazine-search-unlikely-say
———. "Publishers in Race to Match Google." Information World Review, 30 May 2006. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2157106/publishers-race-match-google
Coleman, Mary Sue. "Riches We Must Share . . ." The Washington Post, 22 October 2005, A21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101451.html
Costantino, Melanie. "Fairly Used: Why Google's Book Project Should Prevail under the Fair Use Defense." Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 17 (Autumn 2006): 235-277.
Courant, Paul N. "Scholarship and Academic Libraries (and Their Kin) in the World of Google." First Monday 11, no. 8 (2006). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1382
Crawford, Walt. "Book Searching: OCA/GBS Update." Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 7, no. 1 (2007). http://citesandinsights.info/v7i1b.htm
———. "Discovering Books: OCA & GBS Retrospective." Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 8, no. 1 (2008). http://citesandinsights.info/v8i1c.htm
———. "Discovering Books: The OCA/GBS Saga Continues." Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 6, no. 6 (2006). http://citesandinsights.info/v6i6a.htm
———. "OCA and GLP 1: Ebooks, Etext, Libraries and the Commons." Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 5, no. 14 (2005). http://citesandinsights.info/v5i14a.htm
———. "OCA and GLP 2: Steps on the Digitization Road" Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 5, no. 14 (2005). http://citesandinsights.info/v5i14d.htm
Dames, K. Matthew. "Library Organizations Should Support Google Book Search." Online 30, no. 2 (2006): 18-19.
Darnton, Robert. "Google & the Future of Books." The New York Review of Books 56, no. 2 (2009). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281
Drake, Miriam A. "University of Michigan President Distresses Scholarly Publishers." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 13 February 2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=15987
Drummond, David. "Why We Believe in Google Print." Google Blog, 19 October 2005.http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/why-we-believe-in-google-print.html
Duguid, Paul. "Inheritance and Loss? A Brief Survey of Google Books." First Monday 12, no. 8 (2007). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1972
Dye, Jessica. "The Digital Rights Issues: Behind Book Digitization Projects." EContent 29, no. 1 (2006): 32-4, 36-7.
Ekman, Richard. "The Books Google Could Open." Washington Post, 22 August 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/21/AR2006082101149.html
Erwin, Jeffrey J. "Copyright and the Digital Library." E-LIS, 2008. http://eprints.rclis.org/15074/
Fisher, Janet. " The Google Book Search Settlement." Learned Publishing 22, no. 2 (2009): 82-83.
Foster, Andrea L. "Google Counters Critics of Library Project." The Chronicle of Higher Education 10 March 2006, A32.
———. "Reading Bad News Between the Lines of Google Book Search." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 January 2008 A19.
Fraser, Eric M. "Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of Simultaneity." SSRN, 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1417722
Gamble, Aundrea. "Google's Book Search Project: Searching for Fair Use or Infringement." Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 9 (Spring 2007): 365-384.
Ganley, Paul, "Google Book Search: Fair Use, Fair Dealing and the Case for Intermediary Copying." SSRN, 2006. http://ssrn.com/abstract=875384
Gbegnon, Kodj. "Digitized Scholarship and the 'Library' Concept: Allowing the History of the Library Exemption to Inform How We View Google's Digitized Library." Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 29, no. 1 (2006): 75-98.
Gibson, James. "Google's New Monopoly?" The Washington Post, 3 November 2008, A21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/02/AR2008110201721.html
Givler, Peter. "Google and the Book Publishers: Testing the Limits of Fair Use in the Digital Environment." NYSBA Bright Ideas 14, no. 2 (2005): 23-25. http://aaupnet.org/aboutup/issues/pgbrightideas.pdf
———. "The University Press Assn.'s Objections." BusinessWeek, 23 May 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2005/nf20050523_9039.htm
———. "A University Press Leader Has Questions for Google." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 June 2005, A27.
Gohring, Nancy. "Europe's Authors Still Resist Google Print." InfoWorld, 19 October 2005. http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/19/HNgoogleprint_1.html
———. "Google Print Gets New Name." InfoWorld, 17 November 2005. http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/11/17/HNgoogleprintname_1.html
Goldsborough, Reid. "Toward a Universal Library." LinkUp Digital, 1 December 2007. http://www.infotoday.com/linkup/lud120107-goldsborough.shtml
Google. "Google Book Settlement." http://books.google.com/booksrightsholders/
———. "Google Checks Out Library Books." http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/print_library.html
Google, and University Library, University of Michigan. "Amendment to Cooperative Agreement." http://www.lib.umich.edu/mdp/Amendment-to-Cooperative-Agreement.pdf
———. "Cooperative Agreement." http://www.lib.umich.edu/mdp/um-google-cooperative-agreement.pdf
Gorman, G. E. "Google Print and the Principle of Functionality." Online Information Review 31, no. 2 (2007): 113-115.
Grafton, Anthony. "Apocalypse in the Stacks? The Research Library in the Age of Google." Daedalus 138, no. 1 (2009): 87-98.
Graham, Jefferson. "Google Print Project Inspires Fans, Fears." USA Today, 17 October 2005. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2005-10-17-google-print_x.htm
Griffin, Daniel. "Yahoo Rejects Google Subpoena." Information World Review, 16 January 2007. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2172648/yahoo-rejects-google-subpoena
Grimmelmann, James. "The Google Book Search Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books." SSRN, 17 April 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1388846
———. "How to Fix the Google Book Search Settlement." SSRN, 17 April 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363843
Grogg, Jill E., and Beth Ashmore. "Google Book Search Libraries and Their Digital Copies." Searcher 15, no. 4 (2007): 18-27. http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/apr07/Grogg_Ashmore.shtml
Hafner, Katie. "At Harvard, a Man, a Plan and a Scanner." The New York Times, 21 November 2005, C1.
———. "Libraries Shun Deals to Place Books on Web." The New York Times, 22 October 2007, A1.
Hanratty, Elisabeth. "Google Library: Beyond Fair Use?" Duke Law & Technology Review, no. 10 (2005). http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html
Helft, Miguel. "U.S. Presses Antitrust Inquiry into Google Book Settlement." New York Times, 10 June 2009, B5. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/technology/companies/10book.html
Helm, Burt. "For Google, Another Stormy Chapter." BusinessWeek, 22 September 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2005/tc20050922_5949_tc024.htm
———. "A Google Project Pains Publishers." BusinessWeek, 23 May 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2005/tc20050523_9472_tc024.htm
———. "Google's Escalating Book Battle." BusinessWeek, 20 October 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc20051020_802225.htm
———. "Google's Great Works in Progress." BusinessWeek, 22 December 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051222_636880.htm
———. "Google's Plan Doesn't Scan." BusinessWeek, 12 August 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2005/tc20050812_4324_tc119.htm?campaign_id=topStories_ssi_5
———. "A New Page in Google's Books Fight." BusinessWeek, 22 June 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2005/tc20050622_4076_tc119.htm
Helm, Burt, and Hardy Green. "Google This: 'Copyright Law'." BusinessWeek, 6 June 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_23/b3936043_mz011.htm
Herring, Mark Y. "Don't Get Goggle-Eyed Over Google's Plan to Digitize." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 March 2005, B20.
Hetcher, Steven. "The Half-Fairness of Google's Plan to Make the World's Collection of Books Searchable." Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 13, no. 1 (2006): 1-76. http://www.mttlr.org/volthirteen/hetcher.pdf
———. "Orphan Works and Google's Global Library Project." Wake Forest Intellectual Property Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2007): 1-38.
Hirschorn, Michael. "The Hapless Seed." The Atlantic Monthly 299, no. 5 (2007): 134-139. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200706/google-book-project
Holahan, Catherine. "Microsoft's Copyright Assault on Google." BusinessWeek, 7 March 2007. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2007/tc20070307_107860.htm
Jacsó, Péter. "Amazon, Google Book Search, and Google Scholar." Online 32, no. 2 (2008): 51-54.
Janes, Joseph. "Google Book Search: Evil or Misunderstood?" American Libraries 37, no. 1 (2006): 74. http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/inetlibrarian/2006columns/internetJan06.cfm
Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Jensen, Michael. "Presses Have Little to Fear From Google." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 July 2005, B16. http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i44/44b01601.htm
Jeweler, Robin. "The Google Book Search Project: Is Online Indexing a Fair Use Under Copyright Law?" In Focus on the Internet, edited by B. G. Kutais, 95-100. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.
Johnson, Richard K. "In Google's Broad Wake: Taking Responsibility for Shaping the Global Digital Library." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 250 (2007): 1-15. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlbr250digprinciples.pdf
Jones, Philip. "ALPSP Calls for 'Urgent' Google Meeting." Information World Review, 16 September 2005. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2142402/alpsp-calls-urgent-google
Jordan, Lawrence. "The Google Book Search Project Litigation: 'Massive Copyright Infringement' or 'Fair Use'?" Michigan Bar Journal 86, no. 9 (2007): 32-34. http://www.michbar.org/journal/pdf/pdf4article1210.pdf
Karle-Zenith, Anne. "Google Book Search and the University of Michigan." E-LIS, 2006. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008800/
Keegan, Victor. "A Bookworm's Delight." The Guardian, 21 October 2005. http://www.guardian.co.uk/economicdispatch/story/0,12498,1597790,00.html
Keller, Michael A. "Mountain View: the Agreement among Google, Publishers, and Authors." College and Research Libraries 70, no. 1 (2009): 5-6.http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/2009/jan/editorial_jan09.cfm
Kelly, Kevin. "Scan This Book!" The New York Times Magazine, 14 May 2006.
Kiernan, Vincent. "Prolific Author Tells Google to Remove His Books from Its Library-Scanning Project." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 October 2005, A42.
Kohler, David, "This Town Ain't Big Enough for the Both of Us—Or Is It? Reflections on Copyright, the First Amendment and Google's Use of Others' Content." SSRN, 2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010768
Kupferschmid, Keith. "Are Authors and Publishers Getting Scroogled?" Information Today 22, no. 11 (2005). http://www.infotoday.com/IT/dec05/Kupferschmid.shtml
Labi, Aisha. "A French Library Leader Urges a European Response." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 June 2005, A27.
———. "Google Library Project Is Culturally Biased, Says French National Librarian." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 4 March 2005, A35.
Lackie, Robert J. "From Google Print to Google Book Search: The Controversial Initiative and Its Impact on Other Remarkable Digitization Projects." The Reference Librarian 49, no. 1 (2008): 35-53.
———. "Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services." Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10, no. 3/4 (2005): 57-70.
Last, Jonathan V. "Google and Its Enemies." The Weekly Standard, 13, no. 13 (2007). http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/431afruv.asp
Lavoie, Brian, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, and Lorcan Dempsey. "Anatomy of Aggregate Collections: The Example of Google Print for Libraries." D-Lib Magazine 11, no. 9 (2005). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lavoie/09lavoie.html
Lesk, Michael. "Should Indexing Be Fair Use? The Battle over Google Book Search." IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine 4, no. 2 (2006): 80-83.
Lundeen, K. "The Google Library Litigation and the Fair Use Doctrine." UMKC Law Review 75, no. 1 (2006): 265-282.
MacColl, John. "Google Challenges for Academic Libraries." Ariadne, no. 46 (2006). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/maccoll/
Mann, Thomas. "Google Print vs. Onsite Collections: Don't Send Your Paper Copies Off to Remote Storage Just Yet." American Libraries 36, no. 7 (2005): 45-6. http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/resources/selectedarticles/googlevsonsite.pdf
Manuel, Kate M. The Google Library Project: Is Digitization for Purposes of Online Indexing Fair Use Under Copyright Law? Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2009. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40194_20090205.pdf
Markoff, John, and Edward Wyatt. "Google Is Adding Major Libraries to Its Database." The New York Times, 14 December 2004, A1.
Martens, China. "Update: Google Provides Opt-Out for Publishers." Computerworld, 15 August 2005. http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;548632850
Mathes, Adam. "The Point of Google Print." Google Blog, 19 October 2005. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/point-of-google-print.html
Mattioli, Michael R. "Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use." bepress Legal Series, 2006. http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1059/
Miller, Rebecca. "Google Deal Debate: Strengthened Partnerships or Diminished Access?" Library Journal, 23 December 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6624787.html
Milliot, Jim. "AAP Sues Google." Publishers Weekly, 19 October 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6275614.html
———. "Authors, Publishers, Google Embrace Settlement." Publishers Weekly, 28 October 2008. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6609308.html
———. "Consumer Group Protests Google Settlement." Publishers Weekly, 6 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6649670.html
———. "Drummond Talks Google Settlement at AAP Meeting." Publishers Weekly, 10 March 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6643621.html
———. "A Fight for Control." Publishers Weekly, 24 October 2005, 4. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6277002.html
———. "First Fruits of Google Library Appear." Publishers Weekly, 3 November 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6280794.html
———. "Google Expands Book Option Abroad." Publishers Weekly, 31 August 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6252912.html
———. "Google Offers Online Pay Plan." Publishers Weekly, 10 March 2006. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6315128.html
———. "Google's Book Search Moves Forward." Publishers Weekly, 28 May 2007, 14. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6446718.html
———. "Internet Archive Latest to Object to Google Settlement." Publishers Weekly, 17 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6652375.html
———. "Publishers Monitor Google's 'Continuous Browsing' Feature." Publishers Weekly, 28 January 2008, 4. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6525828.html
Milliot, Jim, and Andrew Albanese. "Google Deal with Libraries Wins Praise, Raises Questions." Publishers Weekly, 20 December 2004, 7. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA488847.html
Milliot, Jim, and Sarah Gold. "AAP Asks for Google Halt." Publishers Weekly, 20 June 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA609261.html
Milliot, Jim, and Steve Zeitchik. "Google Begins to Push Google Print Program." Publishers Weekly, 11 October 2004, 5, 8. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA470438.html
Na, Nari. "Testing the Boundaries of Copyright Protection: The Google Books Library Project and the Fair Use Doctrine." Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 16, no. (2007).
Neill, Graeme. "BA Hits Out at Google Deal." The Bookseller, 11 December 2008. http://www.thebookseller.com/news/70656-ba-hits-out-at-google-deal.html
New, William. "Questions Raised about Google Library Project's Impact on Knowledge Access." Intellectual Property Watch, 26 November 2008. http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1332
Oder, Norman. "Academics, Citing Public Interest, Plan to Intervene in Google Book Search Settlement." Library Journal, 6 April 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6649587.html
"At Columbia Conference, Harvard's Darnton Asks: Is Google the Elsevier of the Future?" Library Journal, 18 March 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6644834.html
———. "At Panel on Google Book Settlement, Support, Criticism, Contentiousness." Library Journal, 29 January 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6633319.html
———. "NYU's Mandel: Google Book Search Incremental, Transformative, Worrisome." Library Journal, 18 March 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6644844.html
———. "University of Michigan, Library Partners Can Challenge Google Book Search Pricing in Amended Agreement." Library Journal, 20 May 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6659681.html
———. "Warning of Abuse of Monopoly, Library Groups Ask Court to Closely Monitor Google Settlement." Library Journal, 4 May 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6656242.html
———. "Who's Unhappy with Google Book Search Settlement? Some Authors, Many Photographers." Library Journal, 3 April 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6649185.html
Okano, Ari. "Digitized Book Search Engines and Copyright Concerns." Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce & Technology 3, no. 4 (2007). http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/Vol3/a013Okano.html
Ostrem, Steve. "Bibliographic Supernova." Library Journal, 15 February 2008, 132. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6529399.html
Perez, Juan Carlos. "Google's Book Search Available in Publisher Sites." InfoWorld, 1 June 2007. http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/01/Google-Book-Search-available-in-publisher-sites_1.html
Picker, Randal C. "The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-Works Monopoly?" SSRN, 16 April 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387582
Pickering, Bobby. "Google Clarifies Print Differences in Europe." Information World Review, 18 October 2005. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2144054/google-clarifies-print
Pike, George. "Google Print and the Fair Use Doctrine." Information Today 22, no. 10 (2005): 17-19.
Powell, Christina Kelleher. "OPAC Integration in the Era of Mass Digitization: The MBooks Experience." Library Hi Tech 26, no. 1 (2008): 24-32.
Proskine, E. A. "Google's Technicolor Dreamcoat: A Copyright Analysis of the Google Book Search Library Project." Berkeley Technology Law Journal 21, no. 1 (2006): 213-240.
Quint, Barbara. "1923-1963: Google Book Search Targeting More Books for Public Domain?" Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 26 June 2008. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=49685
———."CORRECTIONS: Google Print Not All I Said It Was." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 29 August 2005. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050829-1.shtml
———. "Google and Research Libraries Launch Massive Digitization Project." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 20 December 2004. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041220-2.shtml
———. "Google Beta Tests Book Search Service." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 22 December 2003. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16555
———. "Google Book Search Adds Big, Brave Partner: The University of California." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 14 August 2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17375
———. "Google Book Search Expanding Outlets in Deal With Sony." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 30 March 2009. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Google-Book-Search-Expanding-Outlets-in-Deal-With-Sony-53225.asp
———. "The Google Book Search Settlement: 'The Devil's in the Details.'" Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 3 November 2008. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=51429
———. "Google Library Project Hit by Copyright Challenge from University Presses." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 31 May 2005. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050531-2.shtml
———. "Google Opens Public Domain Books for Downloading, Michigan Launches MBooks." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 5 September 2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=18125
———. "Google Print Expands Access to Books with Digitization Offer to All Publishers." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 6 October 2004. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16357
———. "Google Slows Library Project to Accommodate Publishers." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 15 August 2005. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050815-1.shtml
———. "Google's Library Project: Questions, Questions, Questions." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 27 December 2004. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041227-2.shtml
———. "'Hundreds of Titles,' 'Dozens of Publishers'—Magazines Going Into Google Book Search." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 18 December 2008. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Hundreds-of-Titles-Dozens-of-PublishersMagazines-Going-Into-Google-Book-Search-51957.asp
———. "Michigan Libraries Support Google Book Search Settlement Plans." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 26 May 2009. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Michigan-Libraries-Support-Google-Book-Search-Settlement-Plans-53950.asp
———. "The Other Shoe Drops: Google Print Sued for Copyright Violation." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 3 October 2005. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb051003-1.shtml
———. "To the Ozone and Beyond." Searcher 15, no. 3 (2007). http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/mar07/voice.shtml
———. "Who the Heck Is Tristram Shandy? Or What's Not Wrong With Google Book Search?" Information Today 24, no. 9 (2007): 7-8.
Read, Brock. "Some Publishers Warm to Google Book Search." The Wired Campus, 5 June 2007. http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/2122/some-publishers-warm-to-google-book-search
Richardson, Anna. "German Publisher Retracts Copyright Case against Google." Information World Review, 29 June 2006. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2159366/german-publisher-retracts
Rogers, Douglas L. "Access to Knowledge as a Bridge over the Troubled Waters of Copyright Fair Use—From Jefferson to Mandela to Google." bepress Legal Series, 2006. http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1649/.
Romman, K. H. "The Google Book Search Library Project: A Market Analysis Approach to Fair Use." Houston Law Review 43, no. 3 (2006): 807-846.
Roush, Wade. "The Infinite Library: Does Google's Plan to Digitize Millions of Print Books Spell the Death of Libraries; or Their Rebirth?" Technology Review 108, no. 5 (2005): 54-59. http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/14408/
Rushe, Dominic. "Google Plots E-Books Coup." The Sunday Times, 21 January 2007. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article1294870.ece
Samuelson, Pamela. "Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Booksearch Settlement." SSRN, 16 April 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387782
Sandler, Mark. "Disruptive Beneficence The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries." Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10, no. 3/4 (2005): 5-22.
———. "Google Print: Shipwreck or Clear Sailing?" Charleston Advisor 7, no. 2 (2005): 45-47.
Sanfilippo, Tony. "Why Can't We Be Friends?" Publishers Weekly, 26 September 2005, 94. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6259745.html
Savirimuthu, Joseph. "Legal Reflections on the Google Print Library Project." Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 1, no. 12 (2006): 801-808.
Sayer, Peter. "Google Scans French Literature for Book Search Support." InfoWorld, 17 March 2006. http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/03/17/76592_HNgooglebookfrance_1.html
———. "Update: French Publishers Join Google Booksearch Lawsuit." InfoWorld, 31 October 2006. http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/10/31/HNfrenchjoingooglesuit_1.html
Shah, M. "Fair Use and the Google Book Search Project: The Case for Creating Digital Libraries." Commlaw Conspectus 15, no. 2 (2007): 569-614.
Smith, Adam M. "Making Books Easier to Find." Google Blog, 11 August 2005. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/08/making-books-easier-to-find.html
St. Clair, Gloriana. "The Million Book Project in Relation to Google." Journal of Library Administration 47, no. 1/2 (2008): 151-163.
Staff. "Google Print Goes Live." Publishers Weekly, 6 October 2004. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA469733.html
Stripling, Jack. "Still Searching." Inside Higher Ed, 29 October 2008. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/10/29/google
Su, Anna Liza L. "The Case Against Google Print: Understanding the Scope and Limits of Fair Use in the Digital Age." Ateneo Law Journal 50, no. (2006).
Suarez, Christopher A. "Proactive FTC/DOJ Intervention in the Google Book Search Settlement: Defending Our Public Values, Protecting Competition." SSRN, 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1409824
Suber, Peter. "Does Google Library Violate Copyright?" SPARC Open Access Newsletter, no. 90 (2005). http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/newsletter/10-02-05.htm#google
Taylor, Nick. ". . . But Not at Writers' Expense." The Washington Post, 22 October 2005, A21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101510.html?nav=hcmodule
Thatcher, Sanford G. "Fair Use in Theory and Practice: Reflections on Its History and the Google Case." Journal of Scholarly Publishing 37, no. 3 (2006): 215-229.
———. "The Google Settlement: Boon, Boondoggle, or Mixed Blessing?" Against the Grain 21, no. 1 (2009): 69-72.
Thompson, Bill. "Defending Google's Licence to Print." BBC News, 10 October 2005. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4320642.stm
Toobin, Jeffrey. "Google's Moon Shot: Copyright and the Universal Library." New Yorker, 5 February 2007, 30-35. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/02/05/070205fa_fact_toobin
Travis, Hannibal, "Google Book Search and Fair Use: iTunes for Authors, or Napster for Books?" SSRN, 2006. http://ssrn.com/abstract=944048
Turvey, Tom. "A Perspective on Google Book Search." Information Today 23, no. 1 (2006): 1, 25.
University Library, University of Michigan. "UM Library/Google Digitization Partnership FAQ, August 2005." http://www.lib.umich.edu/staff/google/public/faq.pdf
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. "A Risky Gamble with Google." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 December 2005, B7.
———. "The Googlization of Everything and the Future of Copyright." University of California Davis Law Review 40, no. 3 (2007): 1207-1232. http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/Vol40/Issue3/DavisVol40No3_Vaidhyanathan.pdf
VNU Staff. "Publishers Call for Library Digitisation Boycott at Book Fair." Information World Review, 10 March 2006. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2151746/publishers-call-library-digitisation-boycott
Walker, Leslie. "Google's Goal: A Worldwide Web of Books." Washington Post, 18 May 2006; D01. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051702016.html
Westin, Cameron W. "Is Kelly Shifting Under Google's Feet? New Ninth Circuit Impact on the Google Library Project Litigation." Duke Law & Technology Review, Rev. 0002 (2007). http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2007DLTR0002.html
Wilhelm, Thomas E. "Google Book Search: Fair Use or Fairly Useful Infringement?" Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 33, no. 1 (2006): 107-135.
Wilkin, John. "BackTalk: HathiTrust and the Google Deal." Library Journal, 15 January 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6625155.html
Williams, Matt. "Recent Second Circuit Opinions Indicate that Google's Library Project is Not Transformative." SSRN, 2007. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420116
Wojcicki, Susan. "Google Print and the Authors Guild." Google Blog, 20 September 2005. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/google-print-and-authors-guild.html
Wray. Richard. "Legal Victory for Google in Library Project." The Guardian, 29 June 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jun/29/news.google
Wray. Richard, and Dan Milmo. "Publishers Unite against Google." The Guardian, 6 July 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/jul/06/pressandpublishing.digitalmedia
Wu,Tim. "Leggo My Ego." Slate, 17 October 2005. http://slate.msn.com/id/2128094/
Wyatt, Edward. "Google Opens 8 Sites in Europe, Widening Its Book Search Effort." The New York Times, 18 October 2005, C10.
———. "Writers Sue Google, Accusing It of Copyright Violation." The New York Times, 21 September 2005, C3.
Young, Jeffrey R. "From Gutenberg to Google: Five Views on the Search-Engine Company's Project to Digitize Library Books." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 June 2005, A24.
———. "In Case Google Bails Out on Its Library Project, Universities Create a Backup." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 24 October 2008.
———. "Publishing Groups Say Google's Book-Scanning Effort May Violate Copyrights." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 18 February 2005, A35.
———. "U. of California Will Provide Millions of Books to Google's Digitization Project." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 September 2006, A59.
———. "U. of Michigan Puts Digitized Books Online but Bars Full Text of Copyrighted Works." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 September 2006, A32.
Zeitchik, Steven. "Google Offers Compromise, But Pubs Say It's Not Enough." Publishers Weekly, 12 August 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA634587.html
50 things that are being killed by the internet - Telegraph
By Matthew Moore
Published: 7:00AM BST 04 Sep 2009Comments 138 | Comment on this article
The web is changing the way we work, play and think Photo: REUTTERSTasks that once took days can be completed in seconds, while traditions and skills that emerged over centuries have been made all but redundant.
The internet is no respecter of reputations: innocent people have seen their lives ruined by viral clips distributed on the same World Wide Web used by activists to highlight injustices and bring down oppressive regimes
Below we have compiled - in no particular order - 50 things that are in the process of being killed off by the web, from products and business models to life experiences and habits. We've also thrown in a few things that have suffered the hands of other modern networking gadgets, specifically mobile phones and GPS systems.
Do you agree with our selections? What other examples can you think of? Please post your comments on the bottom of the story – we hope include the best suggestions in a fuller list.
1) The art of polite disagreement
While the inane spats of YouTube commencers may not be representative, the internet has certainly sharpened the tone of debate. The most raucous sections of the blogworld seem incapable of accepting sincerely held differences of opinion; all opponents must have "agendas".2) Fear that you are the only person unmoved by a celebrity's death
Twitter has become a clearing-house for jokes about dead famous people. Tasteless, but an antidote to the "fans in mourning" mawkishness that otherwise predominates.3) Listening to an album all the way through
The single is one of the unlikely beneficiaries of the internet – a development which can be looked at in two ways. There's no longer any need to endure eight tracks of filler for a couple of decent tunes, but will "album albums" like Radiohead's Amnesiac get the widespread hearing they deserve?4) Sarah Palin
Her train wreck interviews with NBC's Katie Couric were watched and re-watched millions of times on the internet, cementing the Republican vice-presidential candidate's reputation as a politician out of her depth. Palin's uncomfortable relationship with the web continues; she has threatened to sue bloggers who republish rumours about the state of her marriage.5) Punctuality
Before mobile phones, people actually had to keep their appointments and turn up to the pub on time. Texting friends to warn them of your tardiness five minutes before you are due to meet has become one of throwaway rudenesses of the connected age.6) Ceefax/Teletext
All sports fans of a certain age can tell you their favourite Ceefax pages (p341 for Test match scores, p312 for football transfer gossip), but the service's clunking graphics and four-paragraph articles have dated badly. ITV announced earlier this year that it was planning to pull Teletext, its version.7) Adolescent nerves at first porn purchase
The ubiquity of free, hard-core pornography on the web has put an end to one of the most dreaded rights of passage for teenage boys – buying dirty magazines. Why tremble in the WHSmiths queue when you can download mountains of filth for free in your bedroom? The trend also threatens the future of "porn in the woods" – the grotty pages of Razzle and Penthouse that scatter the fringes of provincial towns and villages.8) Telephone directories
You can find Fly Fishing by J R Hartley on Amazon.9) The myth of cat intelligence
The proudest household pets are now the illiterate butts of caption-based jokes. Icanhasreputashunback?10) Watches
Scrabbling around in your pocket to dig out a phone may not be as elegant as glancing at a watch, but it saves splashing out on two gadgets.11) Music stores
In a world where people don't want to pay anything for music, charging them £16.99 for 12 songs in a flimsy plastic case is no business model.12) Letter writing/pen pals
Email is quicker, cheaper and more convenient; receiving a handwritten letter from a friend has become a rare, even nostalgic, pleasure. As a result, formal valedictions like "Yours faithfully" are being replaced by "Best" and "Thanks".13) Memory
When almost any fact, no matter how obscure, can be dug up within seconds through Google and Wikipedia, there is less value attached to the "mere" storage and retrieval of knowledge. What becomes important is how you use it – the internet age rewards creativity.14) Dead time
When was the last time you spent an hour mulling the world out a window, or rereading a favourite book? The internet's draw on our attention is relentless and increasingly difficult to resist.15) Photo albums and slide shows
Facebook, Flickr and printing sites like Snapfish are how we share our photos. Earlier this year Kodak announced that it was discontinuing its Kodachrome slide film because of lack of demand.16) Hoaxes and conspiracy theories
The internet is often dismissed as awash with cranks, but it has proved far more potent at debunking conspiracy theories than perpetuating them. The excellent Snopes.com continues to deliver the final, sober, word on urban legends.17) Watching television together
On-demand television, from the iPlayer in Britain to Hulu in the US, allows relatives and colleagues to watch the same programmes at different times, undermining what had been one of the medium's most attractive cultural appeals – the shared experience. Appointment-to-view television, if it exists at all, seems confined to sport and live reality shows.18) Authoritative reference works
We still crave reliable information, but generally aren't willing to pay for it.19) The Innovations catalogue
Preposterous as its household gadgets may have been, the Innovations catalogue was always a diverting read. The magazine ceased printing in 2003, and its web presence is depressingly bland.20) Order forms in the back pages of books
Amazon's "Customers who bought this item also bought..." service seems the closest web equivalent.21) Delayed knowledge of sporting results
When was the last time you bought a newspaper to find out who won the match, rather than for comment and analysis? There's no need to fall silent for James Alexander Gordon on the way home from the game when everyone in the car has an iPhone.22) Enforceable copyright
The record companies, film studios and news agencies are fighting back, but can the floodgates ever be closed?23) Reading telegrams at weddings
Quoting from a wad of email printouts doesn't have the same magic.24) Dogging
Websites may have helped spread the word about dogging, but the internet offers a myriad of more convenient ways to organise no-strings sex with strangers. None of these involve spending the evening in lay-by near Aylesbury.25) Aren't they dead? Aren't they gay?
Wikipedia allows us to confirm or disprove almost any celebrity rumour instantly. Only at festivals with no Wi-Fi signals can the gullible be tricked into believing that David Hasslehoff has passed away.26) Holiday news ignorance
Glancing at the front pages after landing back at Heathrow used to be a thrilling experience – had anyone died? Was the government still standing? Now it takes a stern soul to resist the temptation to check the headlines at least once while you're away.27) Knowing telephone numbers off by heart
After typing the digits into your contacts book, you need never look at them again.28) Respect for doctors and other professionals
The proliferation of health websites has undermined the status of GPs, whose diagnoses are now challenged by patients armed with printouts.29) The mystery of foreign languages
Sites like Babelfish offer instant, good-enough translations of dozens of languages – but kill their beauty and rhythm.30) Geographical knowledge
With GPS systems spreading from cars to smartphones, knowing the way from A to B is a less prized skill. Just ask the London taxi drivers who spent years learning The Knowledge but are now undercut by minicabs.31) Privacy
We may attack governments for the spread of surveillance culture, but users of social media websites make more information about themselves available than Big Brother could ever hoped to obtain by covert means.32) Chuck Norris's reputation
The absurdly heroic boasts on Chuck Norris Facts may be affectionate, but will anyone take him seriously again?33) Pencil cricket
An old-fashioned schoolboy diversion swept away by the Stick Cricket behemoth34) Mainstream media
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer and Rocky Mountain News in the US have already folded, and the UK's Observer may follow. Free news and the migration of advertising to the web threaten the basic business models of almost all media organisations.35) Concentration
What with tabbing between Gmail, Twitter, Facebook and Google News, it's a wonder anyone gets their work done. A disturbing trend captured by the wonderful XKCD webcomic.36) Mr Alifi's dignity
Twenty years ago, if you were a Sudanese man who was forced to marry a goat after having sex with it, you'd take solace that news of your shame would be unlikely to spread beyond the neighbouring villages. Unfortunately for Mr Alifi, his indiscretion came in the digital age – and became one of the first viral news stories.37) Personal reinvention
How can you forge a new identity at university when your Facebook is plastered with photos of the "old" you?38) Viktor Yanukovych
The Orange Revolution in Ukraine was organised by a cabal of students and young activists who exploited the power of the web to mobilise resistance against the old regime, and sweep Viktor Yushchenko to power.39) The insurance ring-round
Their adverts may grate, but insurance comparison websites have killed one of the most tedious annual chores40) Undiscovered artists
Posting paintings to deviantART and Flickr – or poems to writebuzz – could not be easier. So now the garret-dwellers have no excuses.41) The usefulness of reference pages at the front of diaries
If anyone still digs out their diaries to check what time zone Lisbon is in, or how many litres there are to a gallon, we don't know them.42) The nervous thrill of the reunion
You've spent the past five years tracking their weight-gain on Facebook, so meeting up with your first love doesn't pack the emotional punch it once did.43) Solitaire
The original computer timewaster has been superseded by the more alluring temptations of the web. Ditto Minesweeper.44) Trust in Nigerian businessmen and princes
Some gift horses should have their mouths very closely inspected.45) Prostitute calling cards/ kerb crawling
Sex can be marketed more cheaply, safely and efficiently on the web than the street corner.46) Staggered product/film releases
Companies are becoming increasingly draconian in their anti-piracy measure, but are finally beginning to appreciate that forcing British consumers to wait six months to hand over their money is not a smart business plan.47) Footnotes
Made superfluous by the link, although Wikipedia is fighting a brave rearguard action.48) Grand National trips to the bookmaker
Having a little flutter is much more fun when you don't have to wade though a shop of drunks and ne'er-do-wells49) Fanzines
Blogs and fansites offer greater freedom and community interaction than paper fanzines, and can be read by many more people.50) Your lunchbreak
Did you leave your desk today? Or snaffle a sandwich while sending a few personal emails and checking the price of a week in Istanbul?
